Crítica de la razón pura

Immanuel Kant

You are here: Home - Uncategorized - Crítica de la razón pura

Crítica de la razón pura

Cr tica de la raz n pura Nuestra poca es la poca de la cr tica a la que todo tiene que someterse La religi n por su santidad y la legislaci n por su majestad quieren generalmente sustraerse a ella Pero entonces suscitan cont

  • Title: Crítica de la razón pura
  • Author: Immanuel Kant
  • ISBN: 9788430938100
  • Page: 439
  • Format: Paperback
  • Nuestra poca es la poca de la cr tica, a la que todo tiene que someterse La religi n por su santidad y la legislaci n por su majestad quieren generalmente sustraerse a ella Pero entonces suscitan contra s sospechas justificadas y no pueden aspirar a un respeto sincero, que la raz n s lo concede a quien ha podido sostener libre y p blico examen Pr logo a la 1 edici Nuestra poca es la poca de la cr tica, a la que todo tiene que someterse La religi n por su santidad y la legislaci n por su majestad quieren generalmente sustraerse a ella Pero entonces suscitan contra s sospechas justificadas y no pueden aspirar a un respeto sincero, que la raz n s lo concede a quien ha podido sostener libre y p blico examen Pr logo a la 1 edici n de la Cr tica de la raz n pura Immanuel Kant 1724 1804 es el fil sofo que m s ha influido en la filosof a de los ltimos dos siglos El idealismo transcendental, que se expone en la Cr tica de la raz n pura , sienta las bases de una nueva forma de concebir el conocimiento y al hombre que todav a alimenta nuestro pensamiento Esta edici n, precedida de una introducci n biogr fico cr tica, se completa con un ap ndice final con glosario, biograf as y bibliograf a referenciada a la obra.

    • Free Download [Science Book] ✓ Crítica de la razón pura - by Immanuel Kant ↠
      439 Immanuel Kant
    • thumbnail Title: Free Download [Science Book] ✓ Crítica de la razón pura - by Immanuel Kant ↠
      Posted by:Immanuel Kant
      Published :2019-02-05T13:23:25+00:00

    One thought on “Crítica de la razón pura

    1. David on said:

      Immanuel Kant is the kind of guy who not only sucks all of the joy out of life; he takes great pleasure in opening the spigot of your happiness-tank and watching it all spill out onto the burn-out lawn and sink into the earth -- seeping toward the planet's molten, pitiless core and, thereupon, toward its irrevocable dissipation. If he were alive today, I suggest to you that Kant's corporeal manifestation would be that of a paunchy, balding man, eternally sixty years old, who is often seen in his [...]

    2. Manny on said:

      ThesisTurgid, dogmatic, overrated and well past its sell-by.ProofAs Einstein exasperatedly said: if Kant had only been able to stop pontificating about the nature of time and space, he might actually have discovered something interesting about them. Einstein, with considerable justification, felt that he had refuted Kant, and was surprised to find that philosophers were reluctant to accept his claim. To me, it seems clear-cut. Kant repeatedly tells us that time and space are not things; but Eins [...]

    3. Elena on said:

      “Reason should take on anew the most difficult of all its tasks, namely, that of self-knowledge, and to institute a court of justice, by which reason may secure its rightful claims while dismissing all its groundless pretensions, and this not by mere decrees but according to its own eternal and unchangeable laws; and this court is none other than the critique of pure reason itself.” Kant's critical turn shows that the problem of self-knowledge, not metaphysics, is the true subject matter for [...]

    4. G.R. Reader on said:

      When I was about seven, my favorite movie was Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and Mom was dating this philosophy professor who was writing a book on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. One day, I asked him what it was about, and he told me it was just like Chitty. It was a kind of magic car that - I can still remember his words - "was able to drive on the roads of sensation, float on the water of concepts, and even fly above the sea of transcendental illusion". And then he told me the whole story of Chitty [...]

    5. Charissa on said:

      I just Kant stand him.Seriously though why does so much Western philosophy remind me of arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? I swear, these gentlemen had their panties wrapped so tightly I don't know how they ever took a proper dump.The problem with Kant (aside from how much he enjoyed listening to the sound of his own voice droning on and on) is that he was irretrievably mired in a Christian world-view, separated from nature, and cursed with the precision of having been [...]

    6. Roy Lotz on said:

      It is done. I have finally scaled the sheer surface of this work. It involved continual toil, sweat, and suffering—falling down and picking myself up again. But, when you reach the end, when your eyes finally hit the bottom of that final paragraph, the feeling is momentous. You can stand and look down at the steep drop you managed to climb, and reflect with satisfaction that this mountain is one of the tallest. This is an Everest of a book.That was melodramatic, but only a little. The Critique [...]

    7. Nathan "N.R." Gaddis on said:

      Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason marks what is more or less a beginning of philosophy. It is no longer possible to go back behind his Copernican revolution, as if one could do philosophy without taking into account the subject or consciousness. This turn toward subjectivity is only tightened with the Wittgensteinian and Heideggarian turns toward language. Both naive empiricism (Hume, Locke, etc) and strict rationalism (Leibniz, Wolff, etc) are thoroughly overcome, synthesized if you will. Of cou [...]

    8. kaelan on said:

      Both frightfully obscure and logically scrupulous, Kant functions sort of like a philosophical litmus test. Many a metaphysical charlatan (Lacan, Žižek, et. al.) has aped his mystifying prose-style without any attempt to match his rigour. And meanwhile, the most provincial of the analytic camp, unduly equating "abstruseness" with "bullshit," write him off as a mere historical oddity.But the truth of the matter is that the Critique—Kant's magnum opus—constitutes one of the most inventive, m [...]

    9. Maali on said:

      قد صدق من قال : بإمكانك أن تكون مع كانط أو أن تكون ضده لكنك لا تستطيع أن تتفلسف من دونه !كتاب نقد العقل المحض ترجمة غانم هنا - الصادر عن المنظمة العربية للترجمة , في 840 ص, - للفيلسوف الالماني ايمانويل كانط يعتبر هذا الكتاب الكتاب الأهم في الفلسفة الحديثة نظرا للتأثير الهائل الذي [...]

    10. Jenny Park on said:

      immanuel kant is by farrrrr the world's most precise philosopher EVER! haha this text, like many philosophical texts out there was really dry and um long. but there's definitely a reason why this one's regarded as one of the greatest philosophical pieces out there. so the book's premise in a nutshell noone can argue FOR or AGAINST an afterlife/God. he also digs into the idea that our understanding of the world and our ideas are based not only on experience, but on a priori concept it's worth a r [...]

    11. Christopher on said:

      Parsing this carefully is exhilarating. At least it was for me. It made me feel like my brain was growing. You may disagree with the system, but the argument is a marvel. Required reading.

    12. Erik Graff on said:

      With adolescence came nihilistic thoughts of suicide. The reasoning was simple. The public schools and an early interest in the sciences had led me to believe that we are part of an ordered universe, the parts of which are finite, the rules of which are determinable. Like an eighteenth century philosophe, I believed the hypothesis of a creative entity outside of the system, a deity, to be unnecessary. In principle, everything was determined, the past seminally containing all of the future. In pr [...]

    13. أحمد on said:

      لفترة طويلة من حياتي كنت معجبا بالعقلانية و ميالا لها حتي قرأت هذا الكتاب من اول سطر و كانط بلغة رائعة و منطق بسيط جدا يدخل مباشرة في الموضوع و يناقش محدودية العقل من اوجه مختلفة اوضح الكتاب نقاط الضعف في العقلانية و فندها ووضع الفلسفة وقتها في مأزقفبعد ان ادعت الفلسفة وقتها ( [...]

    14. Saleh MoonWalker on said:

      Onvan : Critique of Pure Reason - Nevisande : Immanuel Kant - ISBN : 521657296 - ISBN13 : 9780521657297 - Dar 796 Safhe - Saal e Chap : 1781

    15. Wided Nems on said:

      في كتابه نقد العقل الخالص , يحاول ايمانويل كانت أن يحسم الصراع الفلسفي المطروح في نظرية الابستيمولوجيا عن مصدر المدركات _من خلال البرهنة على مدى تكامل الحدوس الحسيّة والأفاهيم العقلية المحضة في عملية البناء المعرفي , متجاوزًا كل التفسيرات الدوغمائية السابقة عند العقلانيين [...]

    16. Anthony on said:

      I'm trying to decide whether or not I get it.Sometimes I think I have just understood a passage of Kant only to discover that I have actually just beenhaving my own thoughtspertaining to something or other in the content of the passage, and this is sometimes rewarding, but it is nevertheless not exactly what I intended to accomplish.Say Kant is writing about perception or being, and say I misunderstand Kant-- what exactly happens when I misunderstand Kant, and by misunderstanding him, discover s [...]

    17. Giorgi on said:

      how to review CPR? there are various ways of reviewing books, according to the dogmatic method of review our writings deal to the book exactly as it is, that Kant calls dogmatic method when one claims that he fully explored every component of book and has absolute knowledge of itadition of dogmatic reviews is dominated in western tradition, there is also a sceptical claims such David Hume's, who denied every possibility of knowing book, that method of writing is so dangerous because it denied of [...]

    18. Crito on said:

      It's recommended to have at least read Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, and Hume before reading this. And since reading this is a skeleton key of sorts to all philosophy since Kant, he's in this really interesting point between two eras of philosophy. Some of what makes him hard to follow at first is that which defines his approach to philosophy, which is intensely meticulous and methodical, yet laid out plainly. And after you start appreciating his ideas and style, you start getting not on [...]

    19. Erik on said:

      My advice for anyone beginning the K.d.r.V. is to maintain your independence of judgment. Don't get buried in the terminology, the secondary literature or your own obsessions or reasons for approaching the book. Try to think through what Kant is saying and bring before your mind all of the possibilities for what he could mean, then eliminate them one by one, until you have arrived at your reading of the Kritik. I would encourage doing Leibniz and the Pre-Critical writings first, otherwise you wi [...]

    20. Yann on said:

      Un renard affamé, voyant des grappes de raisin pendre à une treille, voulut les attraper ; mais ne pouvant y parvenir, il s’éloigna en se disant à lui-même : « ils sont trop verts ». Pareillement, certains hommes, ne pouvant mener à bien leurs affaires en raison de leurs capacités en accusent les circonstances.J’ai été longtemps comme le renard d’Esope, vis-à-vis de la Critique de la Raison Pure de Kant, principalement rebuté par l’obscurité du texte lorsqu’il m’arrivai [...]

    21. Pierre E. Loignon on said:

      Au lieu de commencer à philosopher en lisant les auteurs de notre siècle afin d'obtenir du succès en faisant de beaux papiers à la mode, Karl Jaspers, dans son Introduction à la philosophie, conseillait aux néophytes d’aller d’abord lire Platon et Kant. Bien que la lecture de Kant sera grandement facilité par celle de Leibniz et de Hume, mais aussi d'Aristote, de Descartes, de Spinoza, de Berkeley et de Locke, je souscris assez bien à l'opinion de Jaspers. Et, de fait, tous les philo [...]

    22. Archetech on said:

      This is a great work. Nearly all philosophy after has been a reaction to it or an outgrowth from it. One cannot tell if this is because Kant was truly so influential or because he saw with such depth and unity the fruitful course philosophy would take. The language can be daunting and exhausting. It is, however, precise and if one can follow the concepts in it, it works almost like a dry poetry that seems to lay bare the foundations of knowledge and experience. It is such a chore to wade through [...]

    23. mohab samir on said:

      أن تعرف حدود عقلك أو جغرافيته أو فسيولوجياه . هو أهم ما يمكن أن تفكر فيه من الأمور ولكن للأسف قلما نجد من يبحث فى تلك المعرفة .ولكم فوجئت وسعدت بمعرفتى بالنقد الكانطى للعقل المحض . سعدت أن هناك من تطوع لوضع هذا المنهج العقلى للمعرفة الإنسانيه المحايدة والبعيدة عن كل تطرف فى محا [...]

    24. Calandrino_Tozzetti on said:

      TITOLO: Ideale sotto l'ombrellone del SapereNon me lo sarei mai aspettato, davvero.Una lettura agile e scoppiettante, la cui scorrevolezza sorprende ancora oggi, grazie anche alla mirabile curatela gentiliana.Perfetto per una vacanza nella quale si abbisogna di un completo relax abbinato a una molleggiata ginnastica filosofica.Divorato proprio questa estate nella ridente Gatteo a Mare, intervallato a pagine e pagine di Settimana Enigmistica svolte assieme alla mia signora: tra un bagno, un trent [...]

    25. C on said:

      Sheer genius alone is why this book deserves five stars, from all readers. I mean seriously, look at the giant noggin on the cover of the book. It's comparable only to Lenin.That said, in a letter to a friend, Kant confessed that this book was the culmination of twelve years of deep thought, and only five to six months of rapid writing with “no concern” for the readers’ leisure. I don’t think it’s too presumptuous to state, that the deeper one delves into the book, the murkier the writ [...]

    26. Δx Δp ≥ ½ ħ on said:

      I thank God for sending Kant to the world, and for everything Kant had brought into the world. It's impossible to imagine what the world is like without him. Kant is not just a hero. He's a prophet of the new age; age of reason.Kant was one of the first philosophers who think about the very process of thinking. He showed us how the human mind and cognitive structure were set up such that we know anything at all. Kant also postulated a different way of understanding reality: Reality is not only p [...]

    27. Geoff on said:

      Well shitballs. Manny's frequent tantalizing updates, pretty much Nathan's entire existence on this site, and Žižek's constant referring back to it have convinced me that this is an unavoidable book. So a copy is now in my hands.

    28. Anti-Climacus on said:

      Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind.This lays the foundation and is the premise for Immanuel Kant's Magnum Opus, the Critique of Pure Reason, where he demonstrates how human knowledge is created. The mind needs the things of the real world to be arranged into categories, otherwise all perceptions would be unintelligible. For Kant there is no thought disconnected of the world, no matter how sublime they may be, they are at all times manipulating or abstractin [...]

    29. Taymaz Azimi on said:

      Finally! No I have not 'actually' finished it. I finished 'Transcendental Doctrine of Elements,' which is what we generally talk about, when we talk about Critique of Pure Reason.Well, this book is extraordinary. During the last 4 months it has been constantly impacting my mind, even in a very personal and daily levels. I would say this book is the most influential text I have ever read in my. But it doesn't mean that I necessarily agree with all presuppositions and conclusions of it.There are s [...]

    30. Gottfried Sam on said:

      Kant is systematic, thorough. I like his way of writing. He is intense, And dense, part of the reasons is because of concepts, definitions. However, I do not think he is the most difficult writer. The brilliant, deepest thinker so far I know is Jonathan Edwards. Kant is crucial to modern Philosophy, definitely worth reading his piece if you enjoy Philosophy. The important things I learnt from this book was that, Knowledge we gain is systematized through our senses. Yes, our knowledge starts from [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *